[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:47:15 +0900 |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> What I am asking for is examples where somebody said (as Juri Linkov
> just suggested to Klaus Berndl) "hey, XEmacs has implemented a good
> solution already; let's see if we can get papers for it!" Or "hey,
> libfoo has some code that does this, let's see if we can get papers
> for that."
Why is it useful to know this?
Even if nobody ever has, there are many reasons why that may be the case
(laziness/"i-wanna-write-it"/hard-to-port/sucky-code/etc).
Chong addressed what seems to be the relevant question, which is whether
there's a irrational bias against using xemacs code merely because it's
from xemacs.
-Miles
--
Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without
individual responsibility.
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, (continued)
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, joakim, 2010/03/03
- Re: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/02
- AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Berndl, Klaus, 2010/03/02
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/02
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/02
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/02
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/02
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, David Kastrup, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, tomas, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, David Kastrup, 2010/03/03
- Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/03
- Re: Fwd: CEDET sync, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/02
- Re: Fwd: CEDET sync, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/03