[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode?
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:41:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday 18 March 2010 21:37:46 Leo wrote:
Hi!
> For what it does, it seems dired-omit-mode should just be an
> interactive function. The name is so confusing that some people are
> suggesting (dired-omit-mode 1) to enable it, which actually does
> almost nothing if you put it in your .emacs file.
The docs are pretty clear on that:
dired-omit-mode is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `dired-
x.el'.
(dired-omit-mode &optional ARG)
Toggle Dired-Omit mode.
With numeric ARG, enable Dired-Omit mode if ARG is positive, disable
otherwise. Enabling and disabling is buffer-local.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If enabled, "uninteresting" files are not listed.
Uninteresting files are those whose filenames match regexp `dired-omit-
files', plus those ending with extensions in `dired-omit-extensions'.
Bye,
Tassilo