[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> Maybe the docstring should say what is the preferred way to enable it
> in .emacs? E.g. (add-hook 'dired-mode-hook (lambda () (dired-omit-mode 1)))
=== modified file 'lisp/dired-x.el'
--- lisp/dired-x.el 2010-01-13 08:35:10 +0000
+++ lisp/dired-x.el 2010-03-25 07:14:18 +0000
@@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ (define-minor-mode dired-omit-mode
otherwise. Enabling and disabling is buffer-local.
If enabled, \"uninteresting\" files are not listed.
Uninteresting files are those whose filenames match regexp `dired-omit-files',
-plus those ending with extensions in `dired-omit-extensions'."
+plus those ending with extensions in `dired-omit-extensions'.
+
+To enable omitting in every Dired buffer, you can put in your ~/.emacs
+
+ (add-hook 'dired-mode-hook (lambda () (dired-omit-mode 1)))
+
+See Info node `(dired-x) Omitting Variables' for more information."
:group 'dired-x
(if dired-omit-mode
;; This will mention how many lines were omitted:
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/