Re: Blocking call to accept-process-output with quit inhibited!! [11 times]

[Stefan Monnier]

>> IOW, maybe there should be a (with-local-quit ...) somewhere so that the
>> user can C-g out of such a state (or the call should have a timeout, or
>> inhibit-quit should not be set, ...).
> Is there a way to get a backtrace instead of the warning?  By looking at
> the code, I can't tell where the message comes from.

Grep for the string in the C code and replace the call to `message' by
a call to `error' (that's what I have in my local branch, but placing
an `error' there would introduce a backward incompatibility with which I'm
not completely comfortable),


        Stefan