[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:07:48 +0200 |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:53, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Indeed, there are a few places where Elisp code binds dynamic variables
> not with a let but with a function argument. I find this revolting, and
> would welcome a byte-compiler warning to "flog the author with a wet
> noodle".
Oh, I agree. Just pointing out to Chong that it really happens in the sources.
Juanma
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/19
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, MON KEY, 2010/09/17
re: e and pi, MON KEY, 2010/09/18