Re: EMACS_INT cleanup

[David Kastrup]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> I mean, it sounds nonsensical, but 1) it makes it compile without any
> other warnings, and 2) if you've said (setq a (buffer-string)) on a
> big buffer and then happen to (intern a), you don't want a segfault,
> do you?

It might distract you enough as to not make your getaway before the
memory bloat police arrives and catches you red-black-handed.

-- 
David Kastrup