Re: Problems with xml-parse-string

[Chong Yidong]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> As for the :foo node names, we can map them to anything else if
>>> required.  Pick an invalid XML character -- any one will do, if this is
>>> important.
>>
>> How 'bout =foo ?
>
> Looks good to me.

If we're going to make a clean break with the old xml.el parse tree
format, I think it makes more sense to go with sxml.  Is there any
technical reason not to?  (Aside from the obnoxious all caps, which we
can safely omit.)