Re: Intervals crash

[Jan Djärv]

2010-09-27 08:55, David Kastrup skrev:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull"<address@hidden>  writes:

> For EMACS_UINT, we can safely say we don't need that extra bit since
> Emacs integers are signed (and smaller in total size) to begin with.
>
> Now that's not at all a comment on your practical experiences (like you
> desired and will not likely get).  This is just another theoretic
> rambling.

There are only 77 places where EMACS_UINT occurs in the Emacs sources.  Most 
of them are casts to and from pointers, and some are sizes (like in 
Lisp_Vector).  It would not be a big job to get rid of them if that is what we 
want.

        Jan D.