[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec-path and PATH
|
From: |
Harald Hanche-Olsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: exec-path and PATH |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:52:16 +0100 (CET) |
[PJ Weisberg <address@hidden> (2011-03-19 17:18:33 UTC)]
> On 3/19/11, Christoph Scholtes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> I would even say
> >>
> >>
> >> It is searched for in `exec-path' (which see).
> >
> > Literally? What does the `(which see)' mean?
>
> Same thing as "(see exec-path)". A reference to another part of the
> documentation.
And so it is entirely redundant, since the "exec-path" will already be
marked as a link.
- Harald
- Re: exec-path and PATH, (continued)
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Hanchrow, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Schulte, 2011/03/21
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Wojciech Meyer, 2011/03/20
Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/19