[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 22:02:29 +0300 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 13:27:07 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > 99634.2.937: Eli Zaretskii 2011-05-09 Backport revisions
> > 103939.1.41..103939.1.44 (inclusive) from trunk (bug#8623)
> >
> > and revision 99634.2.937 indeed made a few changes to xdisp.c. But
> > that version was merged to the trunk much earlier, in revision 104021,
> > and "bzr annotate" still shows that the changes attributed to revision
> > 99634.2.937 were made in 103939.1.41, not in 104201 nor in 99634.2.937:
>
> Haven't we been over this before?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-01/msg00609.html
Yes. My memory is limited to the last 5 months. Besides, _you_ have
been over this back then, not me.
Anyway, the side effects of this never cease to surprise me.
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, (continued)
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/22
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Glenn Morris, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/22