Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications

[martin rudalics]

> It is a very bad idea for `display-buffer-alist' to behave like this.
> While allowing "flexible" behaviors like the above (which I suspect will
> not scale well), it deviates from the typical behavior of alists, where
> only the first matching entry in the alist takes effect.  In the above
> example, if the first entry matches all buffers, all subsequent entries
> in `display-buffer-alist' should have no effect.
>
> Please change display-buffer-alist so that only the first matching entry
> is applied.

So every single entry has to contain all possible rules for the
corresponding buffer?

martin