[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:14:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I agree that SPECIFIER doesn't say that it's a function call.
> Actually in logic, second part of the rule is called ACTION.
In my world, none of the logics we use has such "actions", but I can
definitely live with ACTION instead of RULE.
> I'm worried about size, but with your design this problem could be later
> mitigated with something like this in `display-buffer':
> (let ((function (intern (format "display-buffer-%s" (car specifiers)))))
> (if (functionp function)
> (apply function args)))
Yuck!
Stefan
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, (continued)
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/05
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/07
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/09
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, martin rudalics, 2011/08/09
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/09
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Chong Yidong, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/08
- Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, Juri Linkov, 2011/08/09
Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications, grischka, 2011/08/04