[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:01:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> It might be useful for arranging windows when they are initially
> created, for the purpose of distributing them with equal heights/widths.
> But it's a bit unexpected for that to "stick around" and affect
> subsequent window resizing/deletion commands. If the user wants that,
> she should just set the variable.
Actually I forgot why precisely I wanted them to "stick around".
> Just using the value of `window-splits' would be better, yes. Thanks.
Done.
> (If in the future it turns out that we need this feature for something,
> it would probably be better to reimplement it as a window parameter; I
> don't think we need a special slot for it.)
Agreed.
martin
- Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status",
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/12
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/23