[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:03:00 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:22:18 +0100
>
> > The addendum is "...and so GnuTLS is available to non-Emacs processes
> > too" which is something I did not consider carefully but your mention of
> > wget brought up. We don't want multiple versions of the GnuTLS DLL all
> > over the place, that could be worse for security than a single outdated
> > version. So the package.el install is not a good W32 solution to
> > deliver GnuTLS, after all.
>
> You are very wrong. For starters, MS Windows is not like most GNU/Linux
> distribution that use a system for keeping all installed software in
> sync. The wget example is a red herring. Sharing the gnutls dll is so
> wrong at some many levels that I wont start discussing it.
FUD
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, joakim, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Jason Rumney, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32 (was: gnutls for win32), Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02