[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:10:23 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:42:11 +0100
>
> Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:14, Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On the topic of how hard is to load a dll from an arbitrary location,
> >> that is what I found on the Emacs sources:
> >
> > I think Eli's already aware of that function.
>
> He's repeating that loading a dll with a pathname would require changes
> at the C level.
And I still submit that is so.
> Just that if w32_delayed_load does not fit the bill, writing the
> required function by tweaking w32_delayed_load is so easy that someone
> like me who doesn't know the Emacs C dialect can do the job.
You are welcome to do that and present a complete solution for the
issue at hand. Maybe then this thread will become anything but
hand-waving.
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/03