[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:45:18 +0100 |
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 21:39, Richard Riley <address@hidden> wrote:
> Maybe not, but just about everyone else will. Its why they are
> "defaults" : sensible choices.
What I meant is that I won't use it** so I don't care which defaults
are defined. All of them are equally good to me.
**(Assuming we're talking about an installer for Emacs. I would use an
installer for GnuTLS as a separate package.)
Juanma
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Chong Yidong, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Reiner Steib, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Richard Riley, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04