[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:35:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:36:55 +0100 Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
JB> 2012/1/5 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
>> Not at all. It's just a convenience based on our desire to take
>> responsibility for the security of the software we provide.
JB> Starting with the fact that we shouldn't be providing that software in
JB> the first place...
I mean Emacs. Maybe you do too, I don't know anymore.
>> It will be configurable and transparent when possible, but yes, at some
>> point it may ask you once.
JB> Even if I don't use, and don't want to use, and don't plan to use, and
JB> don't even want to know that the binary somehow included, the GnuTLS
JB> DLL?
Yes, even you personally.
Ted
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, joakim, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Richard Riley, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Richard Riley, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Richard Riley, 2012/01/07