[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:23:59 +0900 |
Juanma Barranquero writes:
> 2012/1/5 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
>
> > You're right. Do you agree with the general idea of checking for
> > critical updates on startup, though?
>
> FWIW, I don't. That is a step (tiny, I know) in the "software as a
> service" direction.
No, it's not. Providing software *as* a service is a different issue
from providing software *with* a service.
There is an issue of "ET phoning home" here, which is not an easy one
for free software (at least as I understand Richard's positions on
these things). But please don't call it "software as a service,"
which is a business model based on decreasing the range of choices
and information available to the user; Ted is suggesting increasing
both, while decreasing certain costs to some users at relatively low
(but not insignificant!) cost to the Emacs project.
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/06
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/07
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, joakim, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05