[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update on the Emacs release schedule?
From: |
Carsten Mattner |
Subject: |
Re: Update on the Emacs release schedule? |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 19:32:29 +0100 |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> For the record, I use a --without-gnutls Emacs while also not
>> using Gnus, and am part of the users seeing the "leaks".
>
> AFAIK you're not seeing leaks, but only excessive memory use (and
> failure to return memory to the system early enough for your taste),
Maybe :). How do we define "early enough"? Hours or days?
I have let it run for hours a couple times without any memory
being released.
I don't want to criticize, but believe it's best to report what I see,
which is apparently similar to what others see.
This is all unscientific and I'd be happy to be shown I was wrong.
How about we agree on a common set of probes and statistic
gathering methods and only report the same set of measurements?
To make it comparable.
I started to wonder about emacs memory usage when on Linux it
consumed 90 to 100 megs. I could hardly believe my eyes, having just
edited a couple small source files.
fixing memory leaks before the pretest (was: Update on the Emacs release schedule?), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/07
Re: fixing memory leaks before the pretest (was: Update on the Emacs release schedule?), Carsten Mattner, 2012/01/07
Re: fixing memory leaks before the pretest (was: Update on the Emacs release schedule?), YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2012/01/07