[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS-compatible ports
From: |
Dimitri Fontaine |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS-compatible ports |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:37:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (darwin) |
chad <address@hidden> writes:
> There are some known issues that make subprocesses slow (usually hits
Oh, I'm using subprocesses a lot. That's a list-processes edited paste
from my current Emacs session (still fast enough, emacs-uptime is just
about less than 24h).
*nnimap* open -- (network connection to
*nnimap*<1> open -- (network connection to
*nnimap*<2> open -- (network connection to
bitlbee run /dev/ttys001 /bin/bash -c /sw/sbin/bitlbee ...
ispell run -- ispell -a -m -d english -B
localhost open -- (network connection to
nntpd open -- (network connection to
offlineimap run /dev/ttys000 /bin/bash -c offlineimap -u
Machine.MachineUI
pgsql.. open -- (network connection to
shell run /dev/ttys002 /bin/bash --noediting -i
tapoueh.org open -- (network connection to
terminal run /dev/ttys003 /bin/sh -c stty -nl ... /bin/bash
Note that I often run commands that launch a transient subprocess (M-x
compile, M-x grep, M-x ack, M-x el-get-self-update, etc), and that I
have some local facilities using shell-command-to-string or the like
too.
Here's also the last line of M-x ibuffer:
525 buffers 15732610 480 files, 10 processes
I'm using desktop-save-mode so that I don't have to reopen every single
file at startup, too.
> flyspell, although it's still usually fast enough in my experience), and
> there have been several discussions about slowness in CC-mode due to unusual
> cases lately.
Thing is it's usually plenty fast enough. My feeling is that it gets
slower and slower with uptime growing, so that I sometime need to
restart Emacs just to get back normal usable behavior.
Regards,
--
dim
Re: Mac OS-compatible ports, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
Re: Mac OS-compatible ports, chad, 2012/01/01