[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:41:18 +0100 |
>> Another possibility would be to give the window a `no-switch-to-buffer'
>> dedicated value and have `switch-to-buffer' / `display-buffer' observe
>> that.
>
> Well, yes, but isn't that like doing dedication all over again?
It would be weaker than t and stronger than other non-nil values.
>> Maybe a `display-buffer-in-window-with-predicate'
>> would cover this.
>
> Yes, I proposed such function one or two messages ago ;-)
It was your proposal I had in mind.
>> (2) Provide some sort of a hook within `display-buffer-alist'. That's
>> easy to document and allows to call a function only for buffers that
>> want it. The downside of this is that a user has to replicate it
>> for each and every alist entry since entries are not merged.
>
> Still, it seems quite flexible.
Let's add this for Emacs 24.2 then.
martin
- Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/28
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/29
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/29
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/31
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/30