[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:50:03 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:41, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
> It would be weaker than t and stronger than other non-nil values.
Well, yes, but at the end, strong, weak, or intermediate dedications
are just ways to define how pop-to-buffer, switch-to-buffer, etc.
react when confronted with changing the buffer for that window. At
some point, wouldn't it just be easier to have an alist mapping
buffer-switching functions vs. dedication values, that each
buffer-switching function would look at? At a minimum, it would make
setup easier, I think.
> Let's add this for Emacs 24.2 then.
Great.
Juanma
- Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/28
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/29
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/29
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, martin rudalics, 2012/01/31
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/30
- Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/30