Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Jason Rumney writes:
 > Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
 > 
 > > I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST
 > > or whatever) call.  That would cover the most users and we can use
 > > confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming.
 > 
 > A lot of users are behind a proxy.  You still have a configuration
 > nightmare to deal with.

Isn't this a Perl list?  Isn't "there's always more than one way to do
it" our motto?

Why can't we have both?