Re: Tabs are ready? -> Let us give a definition of tabs.

[Nix]

On 13 Feb 2012, Stefan Monnier outgrape:

>> The 'never tested' problem is surely best fixed -- once we figure out
>> what the semantics of such an interaction should be -- with a test in
>
> But in the present case it was easier to fix it by removing the
> corresponding unused feature.

Yeah, but it was a nicely orthogonal feature which, *had* consistent
semantics existed, would probably not have been removed. (This is all
rather hypothetical, I know.)

-- 
NULL && (void)