[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr

From: Christophe Poncy
Subject: Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:17:42 +0200
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4

On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:40:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Bastien <address@hidden>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:29:13 +0200

Regular Org testers don't want to rebuild Emacs each time they have
to test a new feature in Org.

Why would they need to do that?  Org is not preloaded into Emacs, so
all you need is compile the new Org files and perhaps restart the
Emacs session, but not rebuild Emacs.

It's so easy and convenient to get their latest development release from their git repo. I must confess that I like this way to stay up to date. I would love to do the same with emacs ;)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]