[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:17:45 -0400 |
We use Bzr, and will continue to use Bzr, because that is a GNU
package and git is not. GNU packages ought to help promote other GNU
packages, because they are all part of one larger project: the GNU
Project.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, (continued)
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Jason Rumney, 2012/04/16
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/16
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/09
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/04/08
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/16
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, David Engster, 2012/04/04
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr [was: Next pretest, and regressions policy], Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/04