[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:05:51 -0800 |
> Your suggestion was to use the shorter 'cl-' prefix instead,
> and at least I think that is a good compromise. So instead of
> using 'eieio-class-name', for instance, we'd rather use
> 'cl-class-name'.
So does this mean that we can no longer know from the `cl-' prefix which library
is involved?
(I don't mean which file in the library, but which library. In the past, `cl-'
pretty much indicated library `cl' - either file cl.el or one of its related
files cl-mac.el, cl-seq.el etc.)
(I have not been following the thread. Just happened to notice this part, which
made me wonder.)
- Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/10
- Re: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, David Engster, 2013/02/12
- RE: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/12
- Re: Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, David Engster, 2013/02/13
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Eric M. Ludlam, 2013/02/13
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/14
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/02/14
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, David Engster, 2013/02/14
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/14
- Re: [cedet-eieio] Cleaning up the EIEIO namespace, David Engster, 2013/02/18