[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:52:35 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 04/17/2013 03:38 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> when you apply Eli's proposed patch, what does the 65 seconds change
> to?
Doesn't add much: 0.9 seconds in one test run,
and that's probably at the noise level. But
regardless of speed it's better to avoid the
complexity of Autoconf and stick to straightforward
C code when it's easy to do so, as it is here.
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, (continued)
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/18
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dani Moncayo, 2013/04/18