emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thing-at-point's meaning of current sexp vs. up-list's: which is cor


From: Kelly Dean
Subject: Re: thing-at-point's meaning of current sexp vs. up-list's: which is correct?
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT)

Forgot to say, I meant in 24.3. In trunk, (thing-at-point 'sexp) returns nil, 
so kill-backward-up-list still doesn't work, but reports "Not at a sexp". I 
guess that answers the question: the bug is in thing-at-point.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]