[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thing-at-point's meaning of current sexp vs. up-list's: which is cor
|
From: |
Kelly Dean |
|
Subject: |
Re: thing-at-point's meaning of current sexp vs. up-list's: which is correct? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Forgot to say, I meant in 24.3. In trunk, (thing-at-point 'sexp) returns nil,
so kill-backward-up-list still doesn't work, but reports "Not at a sexp". I
guess that answers the question: the bug is in thing-at-point.