|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: thing-at-point's meaning of current sexp vs. up-list's: which is correct? |
Date: | Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:31:28 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I'll file a bug report, but should I file it for thing-at-point, or for > up-list? Surely not for kill-backward-up-list. I think the bug is in kill-backward-up-list. `up-list' is definitely behaving correctly here, and thing-at-point is basically free to return anything it feels like (it's a very ad-hoc function which tries to DWIM). Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |