[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:40:32 +0300 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:48:47 +0200
>
> Would it make more sense for eww to use new buffers every time? eww
> would have a backlog of, say, ten buffers, and going back to the
> previous page would just mean popping to the previous buffer.
Why do you want to limit the number of buffers Emacs keeps? Other
browsers don't, I think.
When you go back to a previously visited URL, do you need to check if
it's outdated? Do other browsers? If not, just displaying the same
buffer is all you need to do.
> And it could use `bury-buffer' and rename the previous buffer to a
> name with something leading with " " when you go to a new page.
I'm confused: don't you name each buffer according to the URL it
shows? (No, I didn't yet try eww.el.) If so, the names are already
different.
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/17
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
Re: eww,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: eww, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Karl Fogel, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/19
Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19