[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image-size
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: image-size |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:15:17 +0300 |
> From: Jan Djärv <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:42:28 +0200
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> Loading the image just to determine the size is a huge overhead. The image
> loading routines already know the image size before sending it to the server
> (or the equivalent for W32 and NS), otherwise they could not allocate the
> right size for the Pixmap. No Imagemagic is needed to figure out the image
> size.
Yes. Thus my suggestion to have a flag in the 'load' method that
would cause it return right after computing the size.
- Re: image-size, (continued)
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/20
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/26
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/26
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/26
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/26
- Re: image-size, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/26
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/27
- Re: image-size, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/27
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/27
- Re: image-size,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: image-size, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Willem Rein Oudshoorn, 2013/06/21