[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image-size
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: image-size |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:58:35 +0300 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:07:34 +0200
>
> While it would be good to make all the loaders postpone pushing the data
> to the X server, it's probably not necessary to convert them all (at
> once). XPM images are usually used for (smal) icons and the like. The
> ones that really hurt performance day-to-day are
> jpeg/png/gif/imagemagick images.
That's true, but it's easy to do that for all of them, and the API
needs to be identical anyway.
- Re: image-size, (continued)
- Re: image-size, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/20
- Re: image-size, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2013/06/20
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/21
- Re: image-size, Willem Rein Oudshoorn, 2013/06/21