[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:35:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> If you want to "maximize backward compatibility", why rename anything?
> Why not just use nlinum functions wherever you want, in place of linum
> functions? Why gratuitously change user code at the same time?
> (To be clear, I don't knowingly use either, and I have no code that
> does. My question has nothing to do with my personal use of Emacs.)
Because the main reason to install nlinum-mode is to fix the bugs of
linum-mode, so users of linum-mode will only benefit from those
bug-fixes if they get transparently "upgraded" to nlinum-mode.
Stefan
- Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/13
- RE: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Drew Adams, 2013/08/13
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Drew Adams, 2013/08/13
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/18