[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:18:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> But, in any case, a functionality-removing change could only be called
> at most a "sidegrade". Also, I seem to remember from the last time we
> talked about this, that implementing the missing linum features in
> nlinum wasn't exactly trivial, if at all possible.
There's no doubt that in some cases it's currently a downgrade.
If those can all be fixed, I don't know, but I think the important cases
can be fixed.
Would you be willing to try and be in charge of the change, then?
You seem to have a good grasp of what it would take to make the package
good enough to be a real upgrade.
I'd provide any help I can, of course.
Stefan
- Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/13
- RE: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Drew Adams, 2013/08/13
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/13
- RE: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Drew Adams, 2013/08/13
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/14
- Re: Replacing linum-mode by nlinum-mode,
Stefan Monnier <=