[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: the state of the concurrency branch |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:52:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 08/27/13 11:46, Tom Tromey wrote:
> What is your plan for the no-threads case?
Use the gnulib pthreads module. It arranges for
"#include <pthreads.h" to work on all platforms, with
a no-op implementation for platforms that don't support
pthreads. It's similar to what is in systhread.h now,
except it doesn't impose an extra naming layer.
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, (continued)
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/28