[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: the state of the concurrency branch |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:16:30 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:50:11 -0400
>
> > What about the keyboard fd? is it selected by all threads, or just by
> > some? If the latter, by which one(s)?
>
> Ideally, every terminal should have its own thread, I think.
My question still stands if there's only one terminal in the session.
> The current code only allows a single thread running at a time.
Really? How does it do that?
Anyway, if that's true, threads will be much less useful than they
could be (e.g., fetching a large newsgroup while editing would be
impossible, right?). Also, the implementation of condition variables
could be much simpler and dumber than I imagined.
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, (continued)
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/28
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/29
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/31
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/31