[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
|
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
|
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:26:27 +0100 |
>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014, Bastien wrote:
> Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:
>> Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS other than
>> git?
> +1 for using Git.
+1
Using Git would improve my workflow both for maintaining distro
specific patches and for submitting them upstream.
Ulrich
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", (continued)
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/02
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/02
- PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Karl Fogel, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Jose E. Marchesi, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Ulrich Mueller <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Mitchel Humpherys, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Sebastian Wiesner, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Fabián Ezequiel Gallina, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02