[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:42:02 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:29:09 -0400
> Largish packages are better off in a separate "external" branch.

Why?  The disadvantage is clear: it's more complicated to work with a
package that is on a branch.  What are the advantages?

> > because it no longer fits the other packages in externals in
> > this respect.
> You mean like w3?  rudel?  dismal?
> auctex and ergoemacs-mode are the only two "external" packages which
> have some other upstream.

Then README needs some real rework.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]