[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential

From: John Mastro
Subject: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 19:44:50 -0700


I noticed that the new `if-let' and `when-let' in trunk's subr-x create
their bindings sequentially (like `let*' rather than `let'). Would there
be any interest in renaming these to `if-let*' and `when-let*', and
adding parallel-binding versions under the current names?

It's obviously a tiny matter in the scheme of things, but I do think
it's worth sticking to the existing naming convention given the history
and context.

(If this change would be welcome, and nobody beats me to it, I would be
happy to submit a patch and copyright assignment.)


John Mastro

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]