[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: resolving ambiguity in action stamps

From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
Subject: Re: resolving ambiguity in action stamps
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:26:30 +0200 (CEST)

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> (2014-09-13 06:57:15 UTC)]

> The branch heads *have* canonical names: the SHA1 of the commit.

Eek. Isn't part of the point to not rely on internals of the version
control system? Even if the sources stay on git from now to eternity,
git itself might abandon SHA1 at one point. It is, after all, not
cryptographically secure. Also, branch heads move to new commits all
the time. And branches merge. Not at all sure I understand what you
are proposing.

– Harald

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]