[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: resolving ambiguity in action stamps

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: resolving ambiguity in action stamps
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:06:11 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric S. Raymond writes:
>  > One is a genuinely funny gotcha.  You can't get to git hashes
>  > without going through something semantically like my version stamps
>  > on the way!
> I disagree.  "Think hard" (your words!) about the workflow:
>     Find a bug and make it work
>     Then just "git blame" will find the jerk!

After fixing a bug, "git blame" tends to point to the bug fixer.
Depending on who wrote that couplet for whom, this may actually be the
intended meaning.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]