[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Messing with the VC history
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Messing with the VC history |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:33:14 +0900 |
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> What I'm describing is an scenario where merges are created just
> because someone pushed changes since your last `pull'. Apart from
> the noise on the VC history, this procedure has a recursive nature:
You can't win this one, Óscar. Many Emacs developers, including
several frequent committers, are uninterested in learning enough about
VCS to deal with these issues. Some dislike rebasing in principle or
because doing it properly (as they understand it) involves running
tests on all rebased commits.
Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Messing with the VC history, John Yates, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Lars Brinkhoff, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Barry Warsaw, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18