[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Messing with the VC history
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Messing with the VC history |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:23:22 +0900 |
John Yates writes:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > Some dislike rebasing in principle or because doing it properly
> > (as they understand it) involves running tests on all rebased
> > commits.
>
> Are they under the impression that by contrast a merge
> absolves them of any need to run tests?
Of course not! They know for a fact that they already ran them on the
revisions in their feature branch and on the merged code, and that the
rebased revisions will be *different* from the revisions they ran tests
on. They object to running the tests *twice* when once should do.
- Re: Messing with the VC history, (continued)
Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history, John Yates, 2014/11/16
- Re: Messing with the VC history,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Lars Brinkhoff, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, David Kastrup, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Barry Warsaw, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/18
- Re: Messing with the VC history, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
Re: Messing with the VC history, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17