[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:47:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> You could create the *eww* buffer immediately?
We could, but it would look kinda odd. Or perhaps not? Pop up the
empty buffer saying "Loading..." It's possible.
> Or just look for that buffer name (if you store just the name in the
> process)?
When the connection is made (and the certificate is examined), the *eww*
buffer is still not created.
> At medium or lower `nsm-security-level', I wouldn't expect to be queried
> in the case you describe. But at high or above, I would.
If the certificate is invalid when we're visiting www.google.com, I
think the default (i.e., `medium') setting should be to query the user.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/23
- Re: bug#19109: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/23
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/24
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24