[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
EWW buffers
From: |
Ivan Shmakov |
Subject: |
EWW buffers |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:12:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>> You could create the *eww* buffer immediately?
> We could, but it would look kinda odd. Or perhaps not? Pop up the
> empty buffer saying "Loading..." It's possible.
It’s also perfectly possible to create that buffer but do /not/
switch to it until it’s ready. It won’t help in the scenario
being discussed, but to be honest, EWW already pops its buffers
way to often to my taste.
Consider, for instance, invoking eww-reload in a handful of
buffers in a row, – EWW will switch to each of these buffers as
soon as one’s done, which could very well happen in the middle
of user interaction with some specific buffer.
Granted, it’s possible to switch to a EWW buffer, invoke
eww-reload, wait for it to complete, and only /then/ go to some
other buffer (whether EWW or not), but that kind of spoils the
benefits of asynchronous url-retrieve operation, doesn’t it?
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- EWW buffers,
Ivan Shmakov <=
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/23
- Re: bug#19109: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/23
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/24
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- Re: EWW buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21