[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:36:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure, but I suspect that `inhibit-quit' is not a complete
> solution to the general problem of determining when we're allowed to
> prompt people from asynchronous code.
Prompting from asynchronous code is always bad.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: EWW buffers, (continued)
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Network security manager, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18