[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:23:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> It's definitely not dangerous. IIUC he needs this info to decide
>> whether his code can prompt the user or not. Maybe it won't do the
>> right thing in 100% of the cases, but it's clear that if inhibit-quit is
>> non-nil, we're in a context where we shouldn't prompt the user.
> It's not clear to me at all. Some code could set the variable for
> reasons that have no relation to prompts.
Can you give a scenario where inhibit-quit is non-nil and yet prompting
the user would be OK?
Stefan
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21