Re: Generators (iterators) for Gnu Emacs

[Nic Ferrier]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> PS: In the case of "next", we could solve the namespace issue without
> modules if Elisp had an equivalent to "foo.next".  But the only OO-style
> system we have uses methods which have global scope, so we'd need
> another object system with a different method-call syntax like maybe
> (foo :next).

So agree to add some more core things to make the problem easier.

A with-symbol for example.


Nic