[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:53:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Phillip Lord) skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>> GNU has a culture of high-quality documentation. Texinfo is a tool for
>> that, providing features like indexes, cross-manual references,
>> documentation-oriented markup, and several output media. AFAIK, neither
>> AsciiDoc nor “heavier” options like DocBook support all of that.
>
> Asiidoc does do indexes, as does docbook. And, yes, multiple output
> formats. Seriously, almost everything does multiple output formats.
OK. What about documentation-oriented markup (think @deffn, @deftp) and
cross-manual references? They don’t do that, do they?
>> Info browsers make it easy to browse manuals, search for index terms,
>> follow links, including to other manuals. A Web browser cannot achieve
>> that because a Web browser is not designed for that.
>
> Web pages and browsers can do anything at all. Here is a webpage which boots
> so linux and runs some of GNU
I’ve heard of JavaScript, thank you ;-), but I’d rather (1) run code
that’s hosted locally, and (2) be able to use a JS-less browser if I
have to use a browser at all (I think it’s fair to assume that some
Emacs users would rather use emacs-w3m or eww.)
>> "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> I have discussed this with RMS and, pending my ability to actually write
>>> proper translation tools, we have agreed on asciidoc as a new master
>>> format.
>>
>> That’s a discussion that would need to involve all of GNU, not just
>> Emacs circles. I don’t see how that change could happen.
>
> Not really. Someone has to try it first.
The problem is that GNU manuals refer to each other, and Texinfo nodes
are part of their public interface, in a way.
Leaving out cross-manual refs would be a big loss for GNU as a project
to develop a coherent system, because manuals would be left isolated.
To me, if replacing Texinfo and/or Info results in loss of functionality
at all, that’s a showstopper. I’m surprised alternative systems are not
studied with that in mind.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/12/11
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/11
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Phillip Lord, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/12/12
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/12
Correspondence between web-pages and Info-pages, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/12